By David Wrolson
Dunkirk: We Can’t Even Name True Fascism
Dunkirk: We Can’t Even Name True Fascism
I mentioned
in a previous essay that I hate the movie Dunkirk to the core of my soul and
with the heat of a thousand suns. Dunkirk almost feels demonic to me. The movie
is perfectly aligned to fit modern sensibilities.
Less than a
minute into the movie; the following word crawl appeared on the screen.
“The Enemy have driven the British
and French armies to the sea. Trapped at Dunkirk they await their fate.”
“The Enemy”
My hatred
for the movie started from that point. I could instantly see where the
filmmakers were going. The other team was going to be a nameless, faceless
“Enemy” and not Nazis. For all the current talk of standing against Fascism and
so forth, we can’t even name true Fascism when we were battling for our lives
against it.
The movie
starts with a squad of soldiers in a deserted town that come under machine gun
fire and are almost completely wiped out except for the main character in the
movie.
We are then
dropped with no context on a beach full of confused, frightened men. However,
the real Dunkirk men had context.
They had
just fought a bitter, fighting retreat and they had fought as well as they
could under the circumstances. They, and countless others who didn’t make it to
Dunkirk, had cost the Germans 156,000 casualties. Among those casualties, they
had killed 27,000 Germans. The movie takes that honor away from them.
Throughout
the movie, the British soldiers call the other team “The Enemy.” In real life,
they called him “Hun, Jerry or Kraut.” In the Far East, they called him “Jap”
or “Nip.” The movie dehumanizes the British soldier by having him call the
enemy, “The Enemy.” To me, it is one of the ugliest features of the movie.
Ad-Hoc Units
We see the
main character hiding on the pier to try sneak on a ship. He displays no
courage or selflessness. His actions in the movie mirror what we in modern
times expect that the typical behavior of a soldier is because it is what we
see ourselves doing.
He is
separated from his unit and appears to be alone. However, throughout history,
ad-hoc units of soldiers separated from their units during confusing retreats or
defeats or even advances fought well and they earned their place in Valhalla.
War Is Hell
Every scene
of the movie seems geared to one objective. That objective is to show that “War
is Hell.” That seemed to be all the filmmaker was after. In that aspect, once
again, the movie is perfectly aligned with modern sensibilities. We think there
is nothing worse than war.
Au
contraire, there are many things worse than war. The Soviet Gulags were worse
than war. The loss of the buffalo to the Cheyenne was worse than war. I fear
that the outcome of the rapid move to artificial intelligence will be worse than
war.
“The Enemy Could Be Right Over There”
Midway
through the movie, our “hero” (loosely speaking) is with a group of soldiers
who find a beached boat that might be usable at high tide. As the soldiers
enter the boat they glance toward some sand dunes and one says “The enemy could
be right over there.”
However,
they just hide themselves in the bottom of the boat and post no sentries.
Knowing what the movie is: it would be a bridge too far to expect them to scout
the dunes, but they could have at least posted a sentry. This scene is the
burning focus of my hatred for the movie.
So who are these Germans of whom you
speak?
The only
reference to Germans in the movie that I am aware of are when the Dutch boat
captain comes back to his boat and the soldiers grab him and ask him if he is
German and why he left the boat. He says “In case the Germans come back.”
Wow, completely
out of the blue we hear of Germans. Given the lack of historical literacy among
our youth I am not certain that very many know that “The Enemy” at Dunkirk was
the Germans.
A Part of Something Larger Than
Yourself
The only
ones in the movie who are shown as a part of something larger than themselves
are the crew of the small boat who are on their way to Dunkirk to rescue
soldiers.
However, even
this storyline is irretrievably marred by the inclusion of the shell-shocked
soldier picked up in the channel who fights against going back to Dunkirk to
pick up his comrades.
Once again,
courage and self-sacrifice find no place in this movie. The film makers can’t
begin to grasp that wounded soldiers throughout time have fought to get back to
their comrades.
The
shell-shocked soldier storyline is just another way of stripping honor from
soldiers. It fits with our modern sensibilities of every one as a victim and
that is how we see ourselves acting in that position.
One of the
things I hate the most about the times we find ourselves living in is that we
have stripped the honor from soldiers and, instead, we view them as victims.